Iridologická kamera 3 San Jose
Iridologická kamera na predaj Južná Afrika
Dodávatelia iridologických kamier
Iridologická kamera 3 San Jose
iridology Research & general acceptance
Rita M. Holl, RN, PhD, states that “Within Western medicine, iridology is coAnsidered a controversial science at best and medical fraud at worst.” Proponents of iridology argue that the practice is time-tested with proven results. Although critics acknowledge that certain symptoms of non-ocular disease do appear in the eyes (e.g., brain injury), there is, they argue, a lack of rigorous scientific testing and no evidence that iridology has any merit. Studies published in the Australian Journal of Optometry, the British Medical Journal, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) have found iridologists’ assessment of patients with diagnosed serious diseases including kidney and gall bladder disease to be inaccurate. Iridologists counter that the research itself was faulty, citing problems including poor-quality photos; the absence of important additional information including the ability to see/interview the client; and inappropriate expectations of diagnosing specific diseases, a task outside the parameters of iridology. A more recent study conducted to reevaluate JAMA’s findings in regard to renal failure was published in the Alternative Health Practitioner. Acknowledging that the “study leaves several questions unanswered,” the author reported both similarities and variations in the iridologists’ readings and concluded that the iridologist’s level of expertise is extremely important as well.
Internazionale Medico Scientifica Frasconi
Iridología .NATUROPATÍA – CLASE 21
Iridología ALLA PORTATA DI TUTTI
MAIKONG IRIDOLOGY SOFTWARE Inštalácia a prevádzka
