Iridology Iris جي سائنسي مطالعي تي ٻڌل آهي — اک جو رنگ وارو حصو. نقشي تي نشانن وانگر، آئرس جسماني حالتن، نفسياتي صحت جي خطرن، چئلينج ۽ / يا مختلف عضون جي طاقت ۽ شخصيت جي خاصيتن کي ظاهر ڪري ٿو.
iridology جي ذريعي اسان توهان جي ماضي، موجوده، ۽ امڪاني مستقبل جي صحت جي حالتن کي سمجهي سگهون ٿا مختلف جسم جي سسٽم جو جائزو وٺڻ سان. توهان جي جسم جي مختلف حصن ۾ زهر جي جمعن سان ٺهڪندڙ توهان جي وراثت جي رجحان پڻ ظاهر ڪئي وئي آهي.
Iridology جي سائنس سڄي جسم جي سڀ کان وڌيڪ پيچيده بافتن جي جوڙجڪ جي تشريح تي ٻڌل آهي. – iris
اهو هڪ طريقو آهي جنهن جي ذريعي ڊاڪٽر يا صحت جو عملدار ٻڌائي سگهي ٿو، نشانن يا نشانين مان، جسم جي مختلف عضون ۽ سسٽم جي اضطراري حالت. اهي نشان جسم جي سالميت جي تفصيلي تصوير جي نمائندگي ڪن ٿا؛ اها آئيني صلاحيتون آهن، گهمڻ جا علائقا يا زهر جي جمع ۽ موروثي چئلينج ۽ تحفا.
The four principles that form the cornerstones of iridology are:
فطرت اسان کي ان معلومات کي اکين تائين پهچائڻ سان جسم جي صحت جي اهم حيثيت جي باري ۾ هڪ انمول بصيرت ڏني آهي.
ليبارٽري جاچ جا طريقا جيڪي اڄڪلهه استعمال ڪيا ويا آهن، جيڪي هميشه ضروري نه هوندا آهن، قيمتي، وقت سازي ۽، اڪثر ڪري، مريض لاء غير آرامده آهن. iridology سان، اسان وٽ جسم ۾ ڏسڻ جو هڪ سادي، بي درد، اقتصادي ۽ غير جارحتي طريقو آهي. اهو چوڻ نه آهي ته اهو تجزيو جي ٻين شڪلن کي خارج ڪرڻ گهرجي. ان جي برعڪس، اهو استعمال ٿي سگهي ٿو ڪنهن ٻئي نظام جي تجزيي يا تشخيص سان گڏ جيڪو هڪ عملي استعمال ڪرڻ چاهي ٿو. هاڻي، تاريخ ۾ ڪنهن ٻئي وقت کان وڌيڪ، اسان کي مريض جي حالت جو تجزيو ڪرڻ لاء صحيح ۽ گهٽ پيچيده ذريعن جي ضرورت آهي.
هن ملڪ ۾ علاج ٿيندڙ بيمارين جو 80 سيڪڙو دائمي نوعيت جون آهن. دائمي طور تي متاثر ٿيل مريضن ۾ مليل ٽشوز کي اکين جي آئرس ۾ بهتر طور تي مانيٽر ڪري سگهجي ٿو، ممڪن آهي، تجزيو جي ڪنهن ٻئي طريقي سان.
Iridology انهن دائمي بيمارين جي ترقي يا انهي بيماري يا سوزش جي گهٽتائي لاء هڪ ضروري بصيرت ڏئي ٿي.
Iridology جي سائنس سڄي جسم جي سڀ کان وڌيڪ پيچيده ٽسيس جي جوڙجڪ جي تجزيي تي ٻڌل آهي - iris. Iridology هڪ منفرد نقطه نظر پيش ڪري ٿو تصور ۽ عمل کي روڪڻ واري صحت جي سنڀال. اهو هڪ غير جارحتي تشخيصي طريقو شامل آهي، عام طور تي يورپي عملين طرفان استعمال ڪيو ويندو آهي ۽ موجوده حالتن جي سڃاڻپ ۾ مفيد ٿي سگهي ٿو ۽ گڏوگڏ جينياتي ڪمزورين جي ورثي ۾. اهو معلوم ٿئي ٿو ته جسم جي مختلف حصن مان لڳ ڀڳ 300 هزار اعصاب نظرياتي اعصاب ڏانهن پنهنجو رستو ٺاهيندا آهن. تنهن ڪري، سسٽماتي سرگرمي جو پروجئشن شايد آئرس تي ظاهر ٿي سگھي ٿو.
A Brief History of Iridology. Iridology research began in 1670 when Dr. Philippus Meyens published a paper describing the eyes of his patients when they became sick or injured. He also noticed changes in the eye that came with healing and was able to link points on the iris to specific parts of the body.
Well-controlled scientific evaluation of iridology has shown entirely negative results, with all rigorous double blind tests failing to find any statistical significance to its claims.
In 2015 the Australian Government’s Department of Health published the results of a review of alternative therapies that sought to determine if any were suitable for being covered by health insurance. Iridology was one of 17 therapies evaluated for which no clear evidence of effectiveness was found.
A German study from 1957 which took more than 4,000 iris photographs of more than 1,000 people concluded that iridology was not useful as a diagnostic tool.
In 1979, Bernard Jensen, a leading American iridologist, and two other iridology proponents failed to establish the basis of their practice when they examined photographs of the eyes of 143 patients in an attempt to determine which ones had kidney impairments. Of the patients, forty-eight had been diagnosed with kidney disease, and the rest had normal kidney function. Based on their analysis of the patients’ irises, the three iridologists could not detect which patients had kidney disease and which did not. One iridologist, for example, decided that 88% of the normal patients had kidney disease, while another judged through his iris analysis that 74% of patients who needed artificial kidney treatment were normal.
Another study was published in the British Medical Journal which selected 39 patients who were due to have their gall bladder removed the following day, because of suspected gallstones. The study also selected a group of people who did not have diseased gall bladders to act as a control. A group of 5 iridologists examined a series of slides of both groups’ irises. The iridologists could not correctly identify which patients had gall bladder problems and which had healthy gall bladders. For example, one of the iridologists diagnosed 49% of the patients with gall stones as having them and 51% as not having them. The author concluded:, “this study showed that iridology is not a useful diagnostic aid.”
Edzard Ernst raised the question in 2000: “Does iridology work? This search strategy resulted in 77 publications on the subject of iridology. All of the uncontrolled studies and several of the unmasked experiments suggested that iridology was a valid diagnostic tool. The discussion that follows refers to the 4 controlled, masked evaluations of the diagnostic validity of iridology. In conclusion, few controlled studies with masked evaluation of diagnostic validity have been published. None have found any benefit from iridology.”
A 2005 study tested the usefulness of iridology in diagnosing common forms of cancer. An experienced iridology practitioner examined the eyes of 110 total subjects, of which 68 people had proven cancers of the breast, ovary, uterus, prostate, or colorectum, and 42 for whom there was no medical evidence of cancer. The practitioner, who was unaware of their gender or medical details, was asked to suggest a diagnosis for each person and his results were then compared with each subject’s known medical diagnosis. The study conclusion was that “Iridology was of no value in diagnosing the cancers investigated in this study.
MAIKONG IRIDOLOGY سافٽ ويئر تنصيب ۽ آپريشن
